Talk:Jimmy Norman/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * I will review this article. Cirt (talk) 12:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Images
No images present in the article. Could try posting queries at talkpages of related WikiProjects, and searching flickr. Cirt (talk) 12:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Stability
No issues upon inspection of edit history and article talk page. Cirt (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Other comments
I reviewed the article a while back and since then paragraphs have been conflated and some minor issues were fixed. As pictures are no necessary criterion for GA rating I would advice for promotion. Hekerui (talk) 16:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I will be doing another review/pass of the article soon. Cirt (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Good article nomination on hold
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of March 20, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Yes.
 * 2. Factually accurate?:


 * The using work= field should be used on the cites, so that the work is italicized.
 * These should also be wikilinked.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?:


 * Yes, however I would recommend splitting Coasters, crisis and recovery up into two or three subsections and renaming them.
 * The WP:LEAD should be expanded a bit more.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Written in a neutral tone.
 * 5. Article stability? See above.
 * 6. Images?: See above.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far.— Cirt (talk) 19:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I have changed publisher -> work in citenews and wikilinked each on its first instance. If I should wikilink on every instance, please let me know, and I will do. I have split the section as recommended into subsections and attempted to give properly descriptive headers. I have expanded the lead. Please let me know if this seems sufficient. I'm sorry, but I've so far failed to find a usable picture. Shortly after this was opened, I wrote to a newspaper that had published his picture a few years back, but, alas, have received no response. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Cite 1 could use some more formatting. Cirt (talk) 20:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Where does it say work has to be used instead of publisher and that the cites have to be wikilinked? I wrote two "good articles" without either lol Hekerui (talk) 23:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Technically the "publisher" is the organization, and the "work", is the work. For example, The New York Times, and The New York Times Company. Cirt (talk) 23:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. I've used citeweb for the Allmusic citation. There's no date or author information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

GA Pass
Thanks much to for the quick responses to above. Cirt (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)