Talk:Jingili people

Social organisation template problem
This is the data, but the template used omits the offspring. Anyone capable of fixing this? Nishidani (talk) 11:19, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

, This (above) might be what you want. It is a bit hard to tell. Cheers &middot; &middot; &middot; Peter (Southwood) (talk): 19:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

On the other hand, this (below) is what is in the reference cited (Matthews 1900):

Social organisation data quality
There's clearly some inconsistencies in the data as shown in the article right now. Specifically, these Offspring sections don't appear (in any spelling) in those of their parents: Was there a typo in the source(s)?
 * Tanagree
 * Chingaree

Also, as Mathews used a fairly consistent orthography later on, in which vowels took "Italian" values, my guess is that these two sections ought to be: respectively. yoyo (talk) 05:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Tungaree
 * Chungalee


 * By the way, what do we know of Mathews' informants for this data? Since his many field researches were in south-eastern Australia, and he relied on many correspondents e.g. Strehlow for data on Aboriginal groups further from home, do the sources (1900 and 1908) - or perhaps any of his notebooks - name his informants?  yoyo (talk) 05:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)