Talk:Jingle Jangle (The Archies song)

Requested move 02 January 2014

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jingle Jangle to redirect to Jingle Jangle (disambiguation) and a technical move request will be filed to move to Jingle Jangle. The Bee Gees song's article has been moved to Jingle Jangle (Bee Gees song). Red Slash 04:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Jingle Jangle (The Archies song) → Jingle Jangle – This article was originally entitled "Jingle Jangle" but was moved by another user. The article now at "Jingle Jangle" is a non-single song from a Bee Gees EP. I believe The Archies song should be the primary article since it was a single that charted so it is more likely to be searched. In additional articles that are meant to link to The Archies song are now incorrectly being linked to the Bee Gees song due to the move. LongLiveMusic (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Oppose – There's no reason why either should be primarytopic, as fas as I can see. Dicklyon (talk) 06:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose. per WP:SONGDAB, which specifically and definitively ignores primarytopic when discussing songs/albums with the same name. Jingle Jangle should moved to Jingle Jangle (Bee Gees song), or, if anybody wants to nominate the Bee Gees song for AfD, that's another consideration. I certainly don't wish to reward any editor for highhanded moves. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose - There are several notable songs entitled "Jingle Jangle" in Google Books. Jingle Jangle (disambiguation) should be moved to primary here. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Now available at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jingle Jangle (disambiguation) -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Merged the two versions together -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 06:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose deletion of the BeeGees song is handled through WP:AfD, and if that wasn't the contention, then this is very poorly suggested, as no indication of what to do with the BeeGees song is provided. Further, if we move the BeeGees song to Jingle Jangle (Bee Gees song) then we should have a disambiguation page instead as the primary landing point. -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 05:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * IP 76 no one is discussing whether the Bee Gees song should be deleted User:Richhoncho merely suggested bringing it to AfD. Simply the sole purpose of this discussion is to decide whether Jingle Jangle (The Archies song) should be moved to Jingle Jangle and most people disagree including you as most think a disambiguation page should be the primary. Hope that clarifies for you. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 05:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * LongLiveMusic didn't indicate what should be done with the Bee Gees article, and Richhoncho indicates that deletion is done through AfD, I merely reiterate that stance, that RM is not deletion, and not providing a suggestion as what to do with the article occupying the target destination is very poor, as deletion can be inferred to be the suggested thing to do with the existing article for which no other course of action was provided for in the nomination. -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I pretty sure LongLiveMusic wanted Jingle Jangle moved to Jingle Jangle (Bee Gees song) but forgot to clarify by forming the RM like this:


 * Jingle Jangle (The Archies song) → Jingle Jangle (Only for example purposes)
 * Jingle Jangle → Jingle Jangle (Bee Gees song) (Only for example purposes)
 * it's a common mistake but doesn't mean the user wants the other page deleted. So I've clarified for you no one is discussing deleting it here and you've clearly expressed your standpoint on the page moves. So have a good day. I haven't cast a vote &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 06:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not so common as other people usually leave a suggestion in the rationale as to what to do with the other article in the nomination, even if the formatting of the nomination is missing the other half. Though, it doesn't really affect my lodged opinion, as it deals with this situation already. -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 06:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.