Talk:Joan Shenton

Requests for editing help
While I have made a couple of edits to give context, this article in it's present state violates policy by presenting a complimentary rather than NPOV version of this woman's furtherance of AIDS denial. As editors, it's not our job to pretend as if absurd views and people forwarding absurd views are somehow plausible, especially when referencing medical content, and especially when RSs are firmly one sided in opposition. I have plenty of specific suggestions for edits here, but I will wait until some more experienced editors show up as my level of experience editing is limited. cheers Supaflyrobby (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I think with the new context it's not violently NNPOV as readers are alerted to the frigeiness of the denialism. That said, the article is a mess - it could realy do with a big prune. As the article only gets 4 views/day, it is however not high on my worry list.Alexbrn (talk) 20:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

This is not neutral:
"For their part, the medical and scientific community robustly defend the HIV/AIDS hypothesis, citing conclusive scientific evidence."

This is not a neutral statement, this is biased nonsense. The HIV/AIDS link is a scientific theory backed by massive amounts of scientific research. To discount and downplay it as a "hypothesis" is biased and ridiculous. MageCrafted (talk) 03:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * You are right; good catch! I have attempted to neutralise. Bon courage (talk) 06:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)