Talk:Joanne (album)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 19:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Initial review
Note: this review is still in progress. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * Completed copy edit as part of review.
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * The following need inline citations:
 * She said that "Gaga was the first to ever request this hat in pink, because it's her favorite color".
 * It opens with the track "Diamond Heart" which sets the album's tone.
 * brass-accentuated beats (not supported by the source cited in the sentence)
 * Accompanied by just an acoustic guitar and minimal percussion, Gaga sings "heartfelt" lyrics about her late aunt Joanne. (the source does not say "heartfelt"
 * It was described by Nicholas Mojica of the International Business Times as an "ode to masturbation".
 * During her interview on The Howard Stern Show Gaga confirmed that she wanted to promote Joanne in the "old-school style".
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * Spot check:
 * Ref 6 ✅
 * Ref 17 ✅
 * Ref 30 ❌ the source says that she was able to put her "pain and anguish" into the album, not what the cause of the pain and anguish was
 * Ref 33a ✅
 * Ref 48c/Ref 50b ✅
 * Ref 59 ✅
 * Ref 61 ✅ (but link is dead)
 * Ref 66 ✅ (but link is dead)
 * Ref 77 ✅
 * Ref 83 ✅
 * Ref 100 ✅
 * Ref 107 ❌
 * Ref 42d ✅
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * There are several parts where words that are used directly in the source are not included in quotation marks. See my partial copy edit for a few examples. Please double check that quotations are properly sourced or that they are paraphrased.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * No issues here.
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Fair use
 * Infobox image has adequate fair use rationale
 * File:Lady-Gaga-Perfect-Illusion-sample.ogg has adequate fair use rationale
 * Issues
 * File:Mark Ronson at NH7 Weekender.jpg appears to have been improperly uploaded to the Commons on a CC license. New image of Ronson looks good. 14:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Issues
 * File:Mark Ronson at NH7 Weekender.jpg appears to have been improperly uploaded to the Commons on a CC license. New image of Ronson looks good. 14:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

voorts (talk/contributions) 21:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Completed. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:06, 5 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I will return to this in a few hours. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It's been more than a few hours @GagaNutella, apologies. I am returning to finish my review now and then I will put this on hold. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:17, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi,, no problem! I will wait for your complete review to start it. Take your time. Thanks! Gaga Nutella talk 18:19, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Review completed. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @GagaNutella: I just wanted to check in. If you're able to finish this by tomorrow evening (EST), I will be able to review either then or Friday morning and potentially complete the review. Otherwise, I am going on vacation starting 8/11 and will not be back until 8/21. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I am going to be able to edit it during the weekend. But no problem, take you vacation and when you return we complete this GAN. Have fun! :) Gaga Nutella talk 23:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! voorts (talk/contributions) 23:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, could you please take a look again? I think I fixed everything mentioned. Gaga Nutella talk 01:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * After re-reviewing, I will pass this. I noticed several minor copyvio issues when reviewing again, which I fixed . In the future, please be attentive to making sure that sources are either directly quoted or paraphrased. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)