Talk:Joe Comuzzi

“Conscientious Objectors” to “Wars Not Sanctioned by United Nations”
Greetings user 142.68.224.209

You accompanied your speedy deletion of my edit with the word “vandalism.” In our coming discussion, you might find it helpful to first learn more about Wikipedia protocol at these two links:

Criteria for speedy deletion

Vandalism

Here is one quote from the above Wikipedia link:

“Avoid the word "vandal". In particular, the word should not be used in reference to any contributor in good standing or to any edits that can arguably be construed as good-faithed. If the edits in question are made in good faith, they are not vandalism. Instead of calling a person making such edits a "vandal", discuss his or her specific edits with him or her.”Boyd Reimer (talk) 14:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

-I wouldn't say it is vandalism, but it is awkwardly written and the use of quotes for every sentence subject is, in my opinion, unencyclopedic. This statement can remain in the article (and the other articles to which you added that section) but it should be re-written in a more professional tone or it will likely be removed again.  vıd ıoman  00:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you, vidioman, for your helpful advice. I will follow it now. Boyd Reimer (talk) 12:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)