Talk:Johann Dietrich von Hülsen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 05:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead and infobox;
 * Johann Dietrich von Hülsen (born 1 June 1693 in Babaziens, died 29 May 1767 in Berlin); just the date range is enough, no need of geographical details fixed
 * general lieutenant? I think it is to be "lieutenant general" yes (In English)
 * In the infobox the rank is mentioned as general. But as far as I can see per the prose, the highest rank attained by him was "lieutenant general" done
 * Section 1;
 * (1. Philipp von Weyherr, 2. Christoph Rudolf von Schliewitz); This is not necessary, out of context  moved to note
 * Section 2;
 * Then rank of Otto Magnus von Doenhoff? done
 * Modern equivalent of Fahnrich in braces done
 * Link all the military ranks throughout the article on the first mention—second lieutenant, first lieutenant, major etc. done
 * Then rank of Erhard Ernst von Roeder? done
 * promoted to Captain; no need to initial capitals just "captain" done
 * Section 2.1;
 * Then rank of Leopold I of Anhalt-Dessau? done
 * Then rank of Asmus Ehrenreich von Bredow? done
 * Halberstadt is over-linked
 * Section 2.2;
 * Then rank of Joachim Christian von Tresckow? done
 * Then rank of Hans Joachim von Zieten? done
 * Section 3; all good
 * 5.7% confidence, violation unlikely.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * thank you! All done! auntieruth (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Kindly sign the comment. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * all done. auntieruth (talk) 00:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)