Talk:Johanna Gibson

Untitled
A tag has been placed on Johanna gibson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Reasons to keep page
Anduin13 22:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC) I don't believe this page should be deleted. The subject is a notable IP scholar and is a member of the most successful legal blog in the UK.
 * I concur. --Edcolins 18:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Categories
Please discuss here the removal of categories if you want to do so. I don't quite understand these deletions without any explanations. Thanks. --Edcolins 15:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)