Talk:John Andrews (Colorado politician)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.policyexperts.org/cv/AndrewsJohn.doc. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Andrews (Colorado politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727182010/http://www.policyexperts.org/cv/AndrewsJohn.doc to http://www.policyexperts.org/cv/AndrewsJohn.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Islamophobia accusations
This well sourced section is being removed in a WP:1AM edit war, please explain why the material is not suitable, as there is consensus that it is, as indicated by the numerous users that are reinstating it. The material was also widely reported in reliable sources. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 05:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)