Talk:John Baker White (clerk of court)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 13:56, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Will review within the next 3 days.♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't think you need to link soldier, a lot of links as it is!
 * Lede and early life


 * Business
 * During the absence of the board's president, David Gibson, White served as president pro tempore November 29 through December 13, 1839. -shouldn't there be a "from" after tempore? I'd prefer "until" instead of "through" too.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Preservation
 * Delink Union Army, already linked
 * Delink bound, unnecessary
 * Delink Romney in second image


 * Death
 * Delink Hampshire County Courthouse
 * Change "remarked of" to "said of"

Delink hospitality in last section

Love the house image in the snow, reminds me of the house at the beginning of Citizen Kane!
 * , thank you for the kind words! I took this image while I was in Romney during the February 2010 Snowmageddon. It's a beautiful old house indeed! One of these days, you'll have to visit Romney when you're stateside as you've reviewed many of the articles relating to her! -- Caponer (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Excellent work, looks pretty sound, but you do tend to link excessively I must admit! Meets GA criteria, will pass once you've addressed. Cheers! ♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * , thank you for taking the time to review this article! I admit that I am a bit of an excessive linker, so I've gone through and tried to weed out further instances for wiki-links were superfluous or unnecessary! Take another look when you have a chance, and let me know if you find anything else that needs tweaking or removed! Once again, thank you for taking the time to thoroughly review this article--Mr. White and I are both very grateful! -- Caponer (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)