Talk:John Bradfield (engineer)

Untitled

 * This article was cited (poorly) at a smh opinion piece online on 11 November 2011. Fifelfoo (talk) 04:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Design
John Bradfield did not 'design' the Sydney Harbour Bridge... It was based upon a bridge designed by W G Laws and built in Wylam (opened in 1876). And even then the Wylam railway bridge design was adapted by British firm Dorman Long and Co Ltd of Middlesbrough not Bradfield. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.117.197 (talk) 12:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Bradfield (engineer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120329143906/https://www.sydneywater.com.au/Sustainability/OurHeritageAssets/_item_view.cfm?hi=4570960 to http://www.sydneywater.com.au/Sustainability/OurHeritageAssets/_item_view.cfm?hi=4570960
 * Added tag to http://www.ipswich.qld.gov.au/about_council/media/view_release/?action=viewMediaRelease&id=2717

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 29 December 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure)   CAPTAIN MEDUSA   talk  07:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

– Primary topic for usage and long-term significance. The engineer averages ~40 views per day compared with 4 views per day for the others combined. |John_Ross_Bradfield|John_Bradfield_(engineer)|John_Bradfield_(biologist)|John_Bradfield_(bishop) As the designer of a major landmark this is likely to continue to be the case. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 08:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC) —Relisting. Steel1943  (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * John Bradfield (engineer) → John Bradfield
 * John Bradfield → John Bradfield (disambiguation)
 * Support. I agree there is a primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:30, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose – four obscure guys by this name; no reason to do a primarygrab on one of them. Dicklyon (talk) 05:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * weak Oppose - it could be that way but it already is this, doesn't need to be tidied. Being OZ he is my primary topic but not necessarily anyone elses. Dave Rave (talk) 08:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Dicklyon plus WP:TITLECHANGES. There is a cost to readers for pageswaps, and no benefit in this case.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Can't see any primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.