Talk:John Emilius Fauquier/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok. I changed the web citations to citeweb. I think the book citations were all citebook with the exception of the book quoted in the webpage. Added to the lead and (hopefully) added some commas where appropriate. I probably introduced more punctuation errors than I fixed. :) Protonk (talk) 18:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything seems fine, but Reference 14 needs to be fixed with the proper cite web format. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, but it is definitely non-traditional, as "quoted in" citations vary widely. :| Protonk (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright. :P After reading the article, I have gone off and passed the article. Congratulations. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to Protonk who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)