Talk:John Felton (assassin)

Bias
This is a very one-sided article. Particularly in how it portrays Buckingham as a complete failure. The language is also very emotive and not very objective. Phrases like "the King trusted Buckingham" are stated as objective facts despite being subjective assessments. 49.142.108.46 (talk) 06:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see the "bias." The strong consensus of historians is that the King strongly trusted Buckingham, and it's what historians call a "fact" that shaped decisions and events--it is not "subjective" Rjensen (talk) 03:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)