Talk:John Florentine Teruel

Ploreky revision
@FyzixFighter. I've undid your revision, since that revision by hariboneagle is a misleading and false version that states statements that isn't in the sources. As a wikipedia editor myself, I cannot allow anyone to make misleading and false revisions like revision 1110989640. Ploreky (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Can you be more specific? Exactly which statements in this revision are not supported by the cited sources? Also, it looks like your version contain significant copyright violations, hence me tagging it just now. You have even maintained the odd capitalization from the sourcesI can't tell, because of the revdel, if these are the same copyright violations that were removed by User:DanCherek and User:Onel5969. --FyzixFighter (talk) 23:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for sending this to WP:Copyright problems for further investigation. I don't have time to look at this at the moment – I hope to do so soon-ish but if I don't get to it, a copyright clerk or another administrator will handle the report. DanCherek (talk) 01:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The Main issues about revision 1110989640 is that it states statements not found in the references. Like
 * "Terueul founded the Apostolic Catholic Church (ACC) in 1980s, splitting off from the mainstream Roman Catholicism"
 * In all cases, this sentence is false. Firstly. Maria Virginia was the one who founded it, Secondly, it was still not a church, but an organization. Thirdly, the organization wasn't founded on 1980's but 1960's. Fourthly, when the organization was founded in 1960's, it didn't split off from roman Catholicism. That was an event that will happen in 1992 after the registration of sect. Anyways, this sentence alone is enough proof that the rest of hariboneagle's revision is misleading. What more is the information whithin that statement is not found in any references I have given in the article. That's why, this revision is all but a Prejudist view from an Editor. And because of that, this revision of the article is to be deemed "not neutral" and made with "no encyclopedic tone". Ploreky (talk) 04:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Pardon for the mistakes. Since your text, has been hidden for copyright violation (and need paraphrasing) I have reverted back my additions for the mean time (excluding the misleading statements). Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Its okay, as a fellow Filipino, I understand where you are coming from. Let's all make this article a better one. Ploreky (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sir @FyzixFighter, if copyright violation is all the problem here, I can revise it again. Ploreky (talk) 04:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Copyright issue
I believe that the content I have used is free to reuse. It is because these sources goal is to spread the message of the Church, that's why I believe that it is okay to use content that is under the Church to make the church itself known. And I believe that it is okay to use content like this as long as editors don't do it with officially copyrighted materials and as long as the editors always credit the source by citing and referencing it.

@FyzixFighter@DanCherek Ploreky (talk) 04:36, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Unless the copyright holder has released the content into the public domain or under a compatibly free license, it is not okay to copy it, regardless of whether its goal is "to spread the message of the Church". DanCherek (talk) 04:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * okay, noted Ploreky (talk) 05:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Seal-of-patriarch-john-florentine-l-teruel-acc orig.png

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Papang2.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Archtobiasatpapangflorentino.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Papangpainting.jpg