Talk:John Francis Jackson/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 07:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Progression

 * Version of the article when originally reviewed:
 * Version of the article when review was closed: ]

Technical review

 * Citations: - the citation check tool reveals no errors (no action required)
 * Disambiguations: none found - (no action required)
 * Linkrot: Ext links all work - (no action required)
 * Alt text: All images have alt text (although this is not a requirement for GA anyway) - (no action required)

Criteria

 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I made one change which I think works better, but please check it to see that you're happy with it.


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):


 * It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:


 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':


 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * IMO this interesting article easily meets the GA criteria so I'm happy to pass. Good work Ian. Anotherclown (talk) 07:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Many tks mate. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)