Talk:John Golden Theatre/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 18:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Here we have another excellent article on the theatres of New York by Epicgenius which is once again likely to be close to Good Article status already. I will start my review soon. simongraham (talk) 18:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments
This is a stable and well-written article. 97.7% of authorship is by Epicgenius. It is currently ranked B class and a DYK nominee.


 * The article is of appropriate length, 4,047 words of readable prose, plus a referenced list of notable productions and an infobox.
 * It is written in a summary style, consistent with relevant Manuals of Style.
 * Citations seem to be thorough.
 * References appear to be from reputable sources.
 * Images have appropriate licensing and CC tags. They are main own work, including three from Epicgenius.
 * Earwig's Copyvio Detector identifies a 35.1% chance of copyright violation with the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission report. I suggest looking at this and rewording if necessary.
 * "A terracotta cornice and a band course runs above the ground floor." Is "a terracotta cornice and a band course" a singular noun?
 * I see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.

Please ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 18:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @simongraham, thanks for taking a look. I've addressed all of the above issues (the copyvio matches are almost all proper names). – Epicgenius (talk) 02:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'll start the assessment now. simongraham (talk) 05:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Assessment
The six good article criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonable well written.
 * the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
 * it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * all inline citations are from reliable sources;
 * it contains no original research;
 * it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;
 * it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage
 * it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
 * it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
 * 1) It has a neutral point of view.
 * it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
 * images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Congratulations, Epicgenius. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.

Pass  simongraham (talk) 05:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)