Talk:John I de Balliol

need of disambiguated location
Any location John de Baliol and suchlike is bound to be very ambiguate regarding this guy. Indeed, if John de Balliol is mentioned, at least I firstly think it's his son, the king. Therefore I believe it should be at least a dab page, and that the 5th lord need a disambiguate location, for which reason I now moved him to John, 5th feudal lord Balliol. A disambiguate location obviously benefits from that "5th" since that ordinal is a natural and scholarly used infopiece which makes him disambiguate from any other Balliol. I request everyone not to move this to any ambiguate location. Waimea 08:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Notability
I argue: This guy (father of king John) has so little notability that his article is destined to be a stub into eternity. Does anyone have a contrary opinion, and what are grounds for such? Waimea 08:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Book-keeping records?
''In 1265 Thomas de Musgrave owed him a debt of 123 marks. About 1266 Baldwin Wake owed him a debt of 100 marks and more.''
 * Why is this significant? Valetude (talk) 13:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)