Talk:John Junior

Suspicious edits
This article is quite long relative to the apparent notability of the subject. It is therefore particularly suspicious to find that most of the edits have been made by accounts that have only edited this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7C:362C:4B00:6925:230E:1318:36E8 (talk) 13:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * A number of single purpose accounts that were editing this article have been identified as sockpuppet accounts - see Sockpuppet investigations/Scooterlife. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

I have removed edits with no sources
I have removed edits that have no sources and updated section Hollyoaks IRL with a new source/cited. Please read - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources. Thanks Matthewjackcharlies22 (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Pronouns
I've had a quick whip-through to correct Junior's pronouns to "they/them" consistently throughout. Eleanor (talk) 19:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Notability?
I wish no ill will to this person, but I'm really not sure that there is a need for this page to exist and it strikes me as seeming to have been written either by Duckman or a friend/colleague. The information doesn't, in my opinion, support that this individual is particularly notable enough to justify an entire article about their life, and strikes me as being more analogous to an "about me" page on a website or a CV. Particularly given most of the sources and instances of notability seem to be due to being associated with other topics rather than what Duckman themself has done or achieved, and are tied into local news fluff pieces. Hap1994 (talk) 11:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Had a tidy up
I have tided up this article. Lucyyedits23 (talk) 02:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)