Talk:John Keats's 1819 odes/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Blurpeace  02:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Opening comments
The article has some minor stylistic errors, in terms of the references' formatting. I'll go through and correct those. Blurpeace 02:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I may be a little busy in coming days. Once I get in contact with another editor, I'll resume the review. Thanks, Blurpeace  06:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If there are any issues you see with the article, please let me know and I will try to work on them. I understand your busy schedule, as I myself am not editing regularly at the moment. Mrathel (talk) 05:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Closing comments
I probably won't be able to complete this review in a timely manner, so it may be best to request a new reviewer, Mrathel. There are still some formatting issues, and the sourcing could be done better. The quote may need to be reviewed as well. Good luck, Blurpeace  20:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

New reviewer
New Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I made some minor copy-edits for spelling and to fix typos and some very slight re-arrangement to improve readability.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The article is weel referenced to a number of sources, I assume good faith as I don not have access to the books. It would be good to add ISBNs to all post 1973 books, but this is not a GA requirement
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Good background, focussed on subject.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have no hesitation in passing this as a good artcile. Congratulations! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have no hesitation in passing this as a good artcile. Congratulations! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)