Talk:John L. Scott

Cleaning up
I moved the "External Links" section to the bottom of the page, in normal Wikipedia form. I also made the footnotes conform to Wikipedia standards. This article is still extremely light on content, especially notable content from sources other than the company itself. It appears that given its size and time in business that this article could be saved but it needs some fleshing out. Bfootdav (talk) 11:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, Shelleyro added a bunch of content but there are problems. The "Current" section reads like an advertisement.  The "History" section is all original research.  The point is that I'm tagging all of this and will delete it in a few days if not cleaned up. Bfootdav (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

I broke up the content added by Shelleyro to its appropriate sections. I have added some references but more are needed. Sorry didn't know you couldn't link to Facebook pages. Some of her content does not have references. I tried removing it but it kept coming back. I also linked to other articles so this page is hopefully no longer considered an orphan. mariatpruitt 12:57pm, 12, April 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey mariatpruitt. The way talk pages work is that you add new content to the bottom of the page so I moved your comment.  I added back the "reads like an advertisement" tag because it does.  I'm in the middle of wikidrama elsewhere but I'm going to make a point of coming back in the next few days to try make this article more neutral.  If anyone wants to jump in and help tone it down that'd be great. SQGibbon (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Oops sorry! Thank you. I'll look for more neutral information as well. It is kind of hard to find. mariatheresapruitt 4:16pm, 13, April 2010 (UTC)