Talk:John Leak/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 09:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

I'll do this one, comments to follow. Zawed (talk) 09:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC) Infobox Lead Early life World War I Later life References Other stuff Other than the above, this looks good for promotion. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No issues
 * No issues spotted, other than a minor typo that I corrected.
 * I replaced his given name with his surname, but other than that this section looks fine.
 * "...with the heavier Australian's Mills bombs being out-ranged...": a stray possessive here. Suggest "...with the heavier Mills bombs used by the Australians being outranged...
 * "Ultimately, the sentence was suspended.": anything in the sources about this? I assume it is because of his status as a VC recipient but would be nice to be clear on this if the sources can support it.
 * Is there information on the current whereabouts of the VC?
 * Staunton not cited so should be in a further reading section if it is to remain.
 * The year of the 1937 Bean reference doesn't need the "a" disambiguator.
 * Two dab links but these appear to be appropriate
 * One dupe link, World War I in early life section
 * External links check out OK
 * Images appear to have a appropriate licence tags
 * I reckon I've got all these, . I am waiting on a library copy of Staunton to check that I haven't missed anything. Here are my edits. Thanks for taking a look at it. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I should add that there is nothing in the sources about why his sentence was suspended, but I agree it was probably because of his VC. Nothing I can find about the whereabouts of the VC, not at the AWM anyway. Probably with the family I expect. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * G'day, just checking you've seen this. I've done as much as I can without Staunton, although Blanch and Pegram have probably captured everything, I will check Staunton for completeness before ACR. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, this looks all good to me, passing as GA since I consider the article meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 22:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)