Talk:John Leighton Stuart

Political Activities - last sentence
How is that irony? Wen was praised by Communists for his works. Does is it directly mean Communists agree with Wen's particular view on Stuart? Besides, the Communists view on Mao Zedong isn't stable either and he criticized Stuart. There are many factors to consider why a reference to him is not printed. The word "irony" is often misused. --2.245.133.183 (talk) 23:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Leighton Stuart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.lotus-eater.net/ReadNews.asp?NewsID=5497&BigClassName=%E5%A6%99%E6%89%8B%E5%81%B6%E5%BE%97&SmallClassName=%E6%80%9D%E6%83%B3%E6%B5%AA%E8%8A%B1&SpecialID=9
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120604221249/http://nf.nfdaily.cn/nanfangdaily/nfzm/200906250123.asp to http://nf.nfdaily.cn/nanfangdaily/nfzm/200906250123.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425114637/http://www.sino-impression.com/aboutchina20081125155049.html to http://www.sino-impression.com/aboutchina20081125155049.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Ambassador Stuart.webp

Citation that doesn’t support previous material
Why do people do this sort of thing?

“ The book was finished and published by officials of the U.S. State Department to advance a hard line, anti-Communist political agenda, and the angry, pugnacious tone of the book's latter chapters betray Stuart's self-effacing modesty and patrician voice evident in the first six chapters”

…except the citation given is to the existence of his book, not support for the proposition. It is either that people aren’t caring or that they are actively working to disinform. That is not what Wikipedia is for. Kah13 (talk) 02:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)