Talk:John McCain 2000 presidential campaign

Mention of controversial comments regarding Asians
I believe it is appropriate to mention McCain's controversial comments regarding Asians in the section regarding the South Carolina primary, as it garnered McCain bad press in that critical period. Jensiverson (talk) 10:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I've added some more info about it.Ferrylodge (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It belongs in the Super Tuesday section, not the South Carolina section, because it mostly concerned the reaction to him among Asian Americans in California. More importantly, we're now giving it way too much WP:Undue weight.  It wasn't that big of an issue in the campaign.  The Alexander bio, which devotes 145 pages to the campaign, doesn't mention it at all as an issue, as far as I can tell.  A brief mention at most should be sufficient here.  Wasted Time R (talk) 22:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * You may be right. But, this article now says no more about it than is said in the article on his cultural and political image.  Why would it be undue weight here, but not there?  If all that info should go anywhere, it ought to go in this article instead of that one, because he hasn't uttered the word in question since the year 2000.


 * Anyway, if it is just mentioned briefly here in this article, then that brief mention ought to include the fact that he only meant to refer to his captors, that many Vietnamese Americans were not offended, and that he stopped using the term eight years ago.Ferrylodge (talk) 01:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I've moved it, and have tweaked the wording for context, but have otherwise left it all in.   It now gets twice as much space as his famous Virginia Beach speech slagging Robertson Falwell et al.  That ain't right.  I'll come back to this another day.  Wasted Time R (talk) 03:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree that it's not right. The "gooks" thing is taking up too much space in both this article and the article about his cultural and political image.Ferrylodge (talk) 03:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * In the other article, it's modestly relevant as an illustration of McCain's warrior-unto-"straight talk"-unto-blunt approach, combined with his underappreciated willingness to back off same when he realizes it's counterproductive. (That he hasn't said it since 2000 doesn't matter; the article is a history of McCain's image aspects, not just a current-day snapshot.)  Here, it's only barely relevant; this issue didn't make much difference if any, and he was going to lose the California primary no matter what.  Wasted Time R (talk) 03:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I've added a sentence about Vietnamese American reaction to his "gook" usage. If it's mentioned at all, it must be made clear that most Vietnamese Americans are not offended and in fact overwhelmingly supported him in the primary. DHN (talk) 00:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Cultural and political image of John McCain
Talk:Cultural and political image of John McCain Nil Einne (talk) 21:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on John McCain presidential campaign, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060307064950/http://archive.salon.com:80/politics2000/feature/2000/03/10/catholics/ to http://archive.salon.com/politics2000/feature/2000/03/10/catholics/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on John McCain presidential campaign, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080204092307/http://www.farfromglory.com:80/admstockdale.htm to http://www.farfromglory.com/admstockdale.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080311065933/http://archives.cnn.com:80/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/02/08/greenfield.column/ to http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/02/08/greenfield.column/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080305022958/http://article.nationalreview.com:80/?q=NTg4YTBkMzFhNTk5YTE2M2U2ZDgwZDEwZWI0ZGM0MWI= to http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTg4YTBkMzFhNTk5YTE2M2U2ZDgwZDEwZWI0ZGM0MWI=
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080205032214/http://www.asianweek.com:80/2000_02_24/feature_vietamreaction.html to http://asianweek.com/2000_02_24/feature_vietamreaction.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080125114418/http://archives.cnn.com:80/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/09/mccain.bradley/ to http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/09/mccain.bradley/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080121115217/http://article.nationalreview.com:80/?q=YjFiOWRjNmUwMDczODFlOWI3N2U1NmIwZWE1Njc0NjM=&w=MA== to http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjFiOWRjNmUwMDczODFlOWI3N2U1NmIwZWE1Njc0NjM=&w=MA==

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on John McCain presidential campaign, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.farfromglory.com/admstockdale.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/02/08/greenfield.column/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTg4YTBkMzFhNTk5YTE2M2U2ZDgwZDEwZWI0ZGM0MWI%3D
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thenation.com/doc/20000228/corn
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20001102101856/http://www.asianweek.com/2000_02_24/feature_mccainapology.html to http://www.asianweek.com/2000_02_24/feature_mccainapology.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.asianweek.com/2000_02_24/feature_vietamreaction.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130810022900/http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/08/super.tuesday/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/08/super.tuesday/index.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/09/mccain.bradley/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dadmag.com/archive/060400jmccain.php
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjFiOWRjNmUwMDczODFlOWI3N2U1NmIwZWE1Njc0NjM%3D&w=MA%3D%3D

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)