Talk:John Morrison and the Miz/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Starting review. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The article is reasonably well written and follows the guidelines of WP:MOS Jezhotwells (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The article is well referenced, all web links are live. There are no ambiguous wiki links. The cited references support the statements made in the article. The sources appear to be reliable secondary sources. I find no evidence of original research. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)  I fixed some wiki redirects. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article is broad in its coverage of the partnership. It is focussed and does not stray outside the subject. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article adheres to a neutral point of view. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * There is no evidence of edit warring, updates are made as and when notable new events are reported. The talk page show evidence of editors working together to improve the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Appropriate images are used from Wiki Commons, correctly tagged and licensed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The article checks against all above criteria and I am happy to pass it as a Good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The article checks against all above criteria and I am happy to pass it as a Good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Seeing as neither ThinkBlue or NiciVampireHeart are online at the moment to my knowledge, if there are any problems I'll take care of them for them. Just to inform you of that. I told Nici I would if neither were online. From what it looks like, I'll probably not need to.-- Will C  20:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)