Talk:John Papola

Citation problems
The latter paragraphs of the political views section is problematic because it relies exclusively on Papola's writings. If you consult the Murray Rothbard page, you'll note that best practice is to combine an independent RS with a primary source to explain an individual's views. This was done with the Washington Times citation, but it's not followed up with later claims. I'm not sure this is in line with Wiki best practices.

I also think that a heavy reliance on claims from Emergent Order and LinkedIn are problematic because they are not verified by an impartial source. In fact, the sourcing for this article in its entirety appears questionable, given the heavy reliance on primary sources and presence of only one third-party RS. I suspect this page may require some major revisions. AttackTheRivers (talk) 03:33, 7 November 2013 (UTC)