Talk:John Parkinson (botanist)/Archive: GA review

GA review
I've taken on this review, due to other commitments, may not be very speedy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimfbleak (talk • contribs) 10:41, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * No worries, take your time. :-) &mdash; Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 12:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I've made one minor revision, checked images and refs, so here goes

Good Article nomination

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Jimfbleak (talk) 07:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Wonderful! Thanks for the Christmas present. &mdash; Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 00:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)