Talk:John Paul Jackson

Response to woes of 2012 prophecy
John Paul Jackson talked about the 'Woes of 2012', however most commentators would say that 2012 has passed without a significant increase in disasters compared with other years. Has John Paul Jackson provided any response or follow up on this prophecy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.16.228.6 (talk) 20:24, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

If you listened carefully to John Paul's message, then you know that he included an effectual "disclaimer" in saying that the things he sees are absolutely not 'set in stone', as it were. He explains that various factors can affect whether or not things occur and can even affect the degree of severity and that's a pretty routine part of the details that he shares. You might want to go back and check. Additionally, he said that part of his reason for sharing the things was to get people to pray and intercede, specifically to have an intervening effect. Those are contingency issues that should not be missed. He makes these things clear every time he shares significant and large scale prophetic possibilities and is quite emphatic that they aren't absolute.76.6.66.223 (talk) 18:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Actually it would be good to hear John Paul's response. The charismatic/non-denominational prophetic crowd is rarely held accountable for their words these days nor are their spirits tested, as the bible states they should be. Jackson clearly uses heavy prophetic verbiage yet back tracks and skirts around owning any responsibility when things don't come to pass by claiming it wasn't really a prophecy to begin with. This 'prophetic pretentiousness' is a plague in the charismatic community. Nobody wants to admit their vague prophetic utterances didn't come true because well, that would mean that they don't have the gift of prophesy. It's also why most charismatic 'prophets' stick to ambiguous messages like 'Good things are about to happen to you', 'something's about to happen--soon', 'God's gonna bless your ministry' (I can't tell you how many times have I heard this in church services)--all of which are laced in prophetic language designed to imply these men are prophesying. Yet the language is kept ambiguous enough so that in the event these things don't actually take place, they can retract their statements. Again, it is pretentious and dangerously pharisaical--touting spiritual gifts one doesn't have in order to be seen by men. The church is in a sad state of affairs today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.119.236.20 (talk) 15:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Nominated for Neutrality Check
I've nominated this article to be checked for its neutrality because the vast majority of citations come from either the subject's own works or from his ministries. Additionally, the article states that Mr. Jackson appearance on "It's Supernatural" was seen on several networks/outlets, but the citation provided does not show this. Also, the article states that the "subject of The Perfect Storm has been discussed on multiple mainstream television programs, including Joni Table Talk, and Sid Roth's, It's Supernatural!", both of which appear to be web-based and not "mainstream television". Looking forward to any discussion. Kkbay (talk) 01:11, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Actually, those programs listed above are on regular TV stations that are carried by both DirecTV and DISH satellite networks, and some of the major cable carriers. They are not internet-based or produced TV shows. (24.117.109.2 (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2014 (UTC))

I think that if conscientious editors have a problem with the neutrality of this page, then they should make a beeline to all the National Geographic pages for they are all nothing but "puff pieces" that look like they came straight from NG promotional literature. Appreciate your diligence in wanting a NPOV and hope you nominate the NG pages to be checked for a NPOV because they surely need some editing.76.6.66.223 (talk) 18:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Paul Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090914230921/http://www.streamsministries.com/index.php?page_id=78 to http://www.streamsministries.com/index.php?page_id=78

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Paul Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20110716103234/http://www.streamsministries.com/video/92 to http://www.streamsministries.com/video/92
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101214142228/http://lutheranrenewal.org/newsletters/0509b.pdf to http://www.lutheranrenewal.org/newsletters/0509b.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)