Talk:John Smith's Brewery/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hghyux (talk · contribs) 23:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Checklist 1

 * Not an obvious failure. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 23:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The article should be clearly written, in good prose, with correct spelling and grammar. Check for coherent formatting, good organization of the article into sections, appropriate use of wikilinks, and other aspects of the Manual of Style referred to in the Good article criteria. After you have read the article, check that the lead section is a good summary and introduction to the topic. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 23:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The article should be factually accurate according to reliable sources, with inline citations (typically using either footnotes or Harvard (parenthetical) references) for the six types of material named in the GA criteria. The article should not copy text from sources without quotation or in text attribution, and it should not contain any original synthesis of source material, or other forms of original research. Perfectly formatted citations are not required. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 23:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The article should broadly cover the topic without unnecessary digressions. The article may, and sometimes should, go into detail, but it is not required to be comprehensive. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 23:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The article should be written from the neutral point of view: this viewpoint strives to represent all other views fairly, proportionately, and without bias. Ensure that the article describes disputes without engaging in them. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 23:58, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The article should be stable, with no ongoing edit wars: constructive article improvement and routine editing does not apply here. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 23:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The article should comply with image use policy. Images are encouraged but not required. Any images used should be appropriate to the article, have captions and free licenses or valid fair use rationales. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:01, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The article is free of obvious copyright violations. Reviewers can use several tools, as well as Google searches, to help establish whether material has been plagiarised or cut-and-paste from some of the electronic sources used; but this is not a trivial undertaking. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

List checks out fine. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Checklist 2
This will only be checked if Checklist 1 passes.


 * Reliable sources? Sources check out fine. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Free of copyivos? Copyvio free. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Result
 * ✅ Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Summary
 * A big congrats to the users who contributed to this article to get it listed as a good article!
 * Your article meets the criteria, but if you wish to push forward to FA status, you should cite some more things that may be controversial in the lead section, controversy section etc. and a bit more detail would be helpful, but otherwise you are good! Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)