Talk:John Stanton (journalist)

Untitled
John, I read your articles on HTS. Who did you interview? I noticed that you didn't mention any of your sources; why is that? Weren't they proud of the things that they said? Or perhaps it was because they were the one that were fired by HTS for THEIR ethics, morals, bad attitude, and fraudulent behavior. Did you talk to Steve F, Jim G or Karen C, or did you just take the word of someone that had an axe to grind? This page lists you as a journalist, but are you acting like one or are you really just a platform for the incompetent, the lazy, the complainers or the world? Calling yourself a journalist is a disgrace to REAL journalists that attempt to report news, not bitches. Respectfully, Terry Griswold

Mr Stanton, That was a great article on HTS. I hate that organization. I was fired because I lost my security clearance because I left classified material out in the open and transported classified material without properly handling it; that and a couple of other things to include voucher fraud and getting in a profane shouting cat-fight with the FMSO deputy director...but all that aside... Don Smith —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.32.153.80 (talk) 15:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Haha...I like see HTS in bad way. I do worng way too and HTS not nice to me. LTC Villacres —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.32.153.80 (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Sections & subsections
"Recent works and professional development" seems to cover what Stanton has been doing. It is not a sub-topic of the "Subjects covered".--S. Rich (talk) 21:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because John Stanton is a distinguished journalist which amply justifies an entry on him. However, through unjustified editing there is no article except notice of speedy deletion. Please restore the deleted article for public review. Thanks very much. --69.86.243.212 (talk) 23:50, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Advert content
Use third party reliable sources that discuss his work to avoid an advert article2C0F:F930:0:3:0:0:0:221 (talk) 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on John Stanton (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307201706/http://www.noetic.org/noetic/issue-six-january/the-watchmans-rattle-thinking-our-way-out-of-extin/ to http://www.noetic.org/noetic/issue-six-january/the-watchmans-rattle-thinking-our-way-out-of-extin/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121014400/http://www.aaanet.org/cmtes/commissions/CEAUSSIC/index.cfm to http://www.aaanet.org/cmtes/commissions/CEAUSSIC/index.cfm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110416010110/http://www.counterpunch.org/stanton11032009.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/stanton11032009.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110804032958/http://www.counterpunch.org/stanton11012003.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/stanton11012003.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100621062047/http://www.counterpunch.org/stanton06182010.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/stanton06182010.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Article neutrality / mentions of pro-Russian bias
This article appears, as of 02 March 2022, to not reflect the extent to which the subject appears to have (either wittingly or unwittingly) repeatedly voiced Russian Federation disinformation / propagandist ‘talking points’ over his career.

IMHO, it currently seems to be more of a promotional biography than a legitimately neutral one.

A review of the article edit history may be appropriate, to identify the source of the sustained non-NPOV bias over time. (Potential ‘sockpuppet’ editor accounts can be referred to the WP ‘checkuser’ administrators for research and potential action.)

A sample of recent (early 2022) items attributed to or referring to Mr. Stanton:
 * https://cryptome.org/2022/02/rusk2022.pdf
 * https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/03/01/arlington-sub-dismissed-ukraine-russia

2601:742:202:DB50:8DF3:B9A5:2EE8:4F96 (talk) 15:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)