Talk:John Tavares/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Checklist

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Very well written, I enjoyed reading it.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Extensive sourcing, well-done.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I love seeing self-taken photos, and these are great action shots. Good job on those.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Great article, I really enjoyed reading and reviewing it. I would recommend nominating for FA status.
 * I love seeing self-taken photos, and these are great action shots. Good job on those.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Great article, I really enjoyed reading and reviewing it. I would recommend nominating for FA status.

Canadian  Nine  19:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)