Talk:John Thomas, Baron Thomas of Cwmgiedd

Sourced content removal
removed some sourced content without explanation, so I restored it.

They have now removed it again with an explanation (on my talk page) that the removed sections were inaccurate and (confusedly?) say it was supported, but I get the impression they mean it is not supported by the sources. This changes the matter from a behavioral dispute to a content dispute (although the behavioral issue of not using edit summaries remains).

The sources for the section 'Russian Money laundering Allegations' do not mention Thomas explicitly and the text only says that Thomas was on the bench when the events occurred. This may very well be true (that he was on the bench) but I agree that the section can be removed because there is no particular connection made via these sources.

The sources offered for the section 'The Gina Miller Judicial Review for Brexit' do not come up for me, but once again, the text seems to imply that things happened while Thomas was on the bench, but there's no connection made. So I'll agree here, too, that the section can be removed.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 21:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)