Talk:John Wagner/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Curly Turkey (talk · contribs) 05:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Names of authors cited normally should be cited as last name, first name.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * There are quite a few uncited passages, including at least one full uncited paragraph. Also, sources such as CBDB and GCD are not considered reliable sources, as their content is user-submitted.  Those sources would be appropriate under "External links".
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * There are quite a few uncited passages, including at least one full uncited paragraph. Also, sources such as CBDB and GCD are not considered reliable sources, as their content is user-submitted.  Those sources would be appropriate under "External links".
 * There are quite a few uncited passages, including at least one full uncited paragraph. Also, sources such as CBDB and GCD are not considered reliable sources, as their content is user-submitted.  Those sources would be appropriate under "External links".
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Seems to cover all major aspects.
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Has Wagner received no criticism? And is "leading light" in the lead really WP:NPOV?
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Issues so far appear to be fixed; is the review done? Wizardman  23:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Ummm...no, actually. There are still uncited passages, and all of the cited authors are still listed first name, last name.  C üRly T üRkey  Talk Contribs 23:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * In that case it should be failed, the writer's had a month to tackle it. Wizardman  01:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. Failed.  C üRly T üRkey  Talk Contribs 01:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)