Talk:John Wieting/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 14:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Nominator: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) at 14:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

 * Missing short description
 * Added


 * Wieting spent "He spent"
 * sure


 * After purchasing equipment specify what type of equipments
 * Sure


 * at the age of forty-five in 1862, better write 45 in number
 * Sure


 * Mary Elizabeth (Manchester) suggesting
 * had immigrated to the US suggesting to spell United States
 * He eventually replace 'he' with his surname
 * over seventeen hundred body parts hyphenate, or write as one-thousand seven-hundred
 * Wieting gave talks any better word than 'talk'?
 * wrote that Wieting's lectures were aimed at shock[ing] and titillat[ing] audiences" the quote ends but never starts!
 * Done all the above


 * attempting to purchase it for $25,000 suggesting to use
 * Hard to do b/c no exact start year


 * for 3/4 ownership use
 * and was buried in Oakwood Cemetery fix the disambiguation link
 * His mausoleum whose?
 * done the above


 * Anything to say about his legacy?
 * added some stuff about the opera house


 * Image missing ALT text
 * Added


 * Footnotes all good!
 * The following sources are mentioned, but never used as footnotes:
 * Keim, Norman O. (2008-06-09). Our Movie Houses: A History of Film and Cinematic Innovation in Central New York. Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0-8156-0896-7.
 * Hirsch, Foster (2000-09-05). The Boys from Syracuse: The Shuberts' Theatrical Empire. Cooper Square Press. ISBN 978-1-4616-9875-3.
 * should be used now


 * Inconsistency in writing publication location: New York, NY v. Boston, Mass..
 * hopefully standardized-- cut all I found

That is pretty much all there is to say!
 * Very high copyvio from https://smiletimegh.com/who-is-john-wieting-biography-career-net-worth/, which is very likely a mirror of Wiki. So, no issues.
 * Thanks,, what do you think now? Eddie891 Talk Work 17:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

We are pretty much near the end of this review, just take care of the following minor points: That is it! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Wrapping up
 * Add something, a line or two, from the legacy section to the lead
 * Sure
 * Date format: 2018-06-05 in "References" v. July 28, 2005 in footnotes section. There are a few other instances as well
 * Should be good now
 * How are you ordering "References"? Suggesting to keep it alphabetical.
 * Alphabetized
 * Thanks again,, What do you think now? Eddie891 Talk Work 13:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Congrats on your zillionth GA! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)