Talk:John William Lambert/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: JPxG (talk · contribs) 06:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

I'll do my best! jp×g

Preliminary notes

 * This has some stuff about a James Swoveland affirming to have ridden in Lambert's car in 1891, that might warrant mention.
 * Thanks for hint (nice catch). I have that article in my article already eleven times as Ref #4.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * User:JPxG Any other issues I should work on? --Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, this one kind of fell off the radar. I will go through it in a bit. jp×g 04:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


 * ✅: Great, no action required.
 * Not necessary but might be worth looking at.
 * Needs to be fixed.

Copyvio

 * ✅ Earwig's detector says everything is fine.

Stability

 * ✅ Article is quite stable. Has not been the subject of any controversy except from an IP address repeatedly adding stuff like "where he learned how to fly" and "harold".

POV

 * Minor amounts of general fluff like "That was a good thing, since", not a big deal.
 * ✅ --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Media

 * ✅ All images are public-domain, clearly illustrative, and cool.
 * What the heck is going on with the front left wheel in this image?
 * ✅ --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Focus / scope / coverage / completeness

 * There were about 300 horseless carriages built up to 1895,[4] but Lambert was the first with a functional working automobile that he created in 1891 Huh?
 * ✅ Copy edited accordingly. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Lambert's father was the president, and he was the treasurer and general manager Lambert was the treasurer and general manager, or his father was?
 * ✅ Copy edited accordingly. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Prose / MoS / ref check

 * ✅ Ref 1 looks good.
 * ✅ Ref 2 looks good.
 * ✅ Ref 3 looks good.
 * ✅ Ref 4 looks good.
 * ✅ Ref 5 looks good.
 * ✅ Ref 6 looks good.
 * ✅ Ref 7 isn't accessible for me but I will try to get a hold of it somewhere. It isn't very load-bearing, so I will AGF.
 * ✅ Ref 8 looks good.
 * ✅ Ref 9 looks good.
 * ✅ Ref 10 looks good.
 * ✅ Refs 11 - 18 look good.
 * Ref 19 is "newspaper clip "Oldest Resident of Ohio City" "Death Claims 1st Passenger of gasoline auto"". No year, no publication, no author, no link... :(
 * ✅ Removed, as other inline references in the paragraph cover the first accident.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * ✅ Ref 20 looks good.
 * ✅ Ref 21 looks good.
 * Ref 22 could do with a link.
 * ✅ Ref 23 looks good.

Conclusion

 * I have been a little consumed by tasks today, so might have to get around to finishing this tomorrow. jp×g 04:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * User:JPxG All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good. Passing.