Talk:Johnny Broderick/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TLSuda (talk · contribs) 18:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Greetings! I know you've waited a few months for a review, but I have good news! I'm stuck in a tin can for 5 hours tomorrow late night UTC, so I'm going to use that time wisely to review this article. I expect to have the review posted in the early morning hours UTC the following day. (Approximately less than 36 hours from this post.) I look forward to reading and reviewing this article.  Cheers,  TLSuda  (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Why thank you! You know, all of a sudden, three of my GA nominees are being reviewed. Quite something. I guess prayer works. Coretheapple (talk) 18:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Initial review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

✅ Coretheapple (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * See image review below.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This is an extremely well written article. I only found one glaring issue: In the Allegations of misconduct section, it says "...against them. and of..." There are also some issues with one image. Just needs a bit of cleaning up and then I'd be happy to pass this article.  TLSuda  (talk) 15:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * See image review below.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This is an extremely well written article. I only found one glaring issue: In the Allegations of misconduct section, it says "...against them. and of..." There are also some issues with one image. Just needs a bit of cleaning up and then I'd be happy to pass this article.  TLSuda  (talk) 15:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This is an extremely well written article. I only found one glaring issue: In the Allegations of misconduct section, it says "...against them. and of..." There are also some issues with one image. Just needs a bit of cleaning up and then I'd be happy to pass this article.  TLSuda  (talk) 15:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Image review
✅ Say, thanks very much for the review! Much appreciated. Coretheapple (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:JackDiamond.jpg does not have a full enough fair-use rationale, specifically looking at WP:NFCC. You can use Non-free use rationale. I would further go to say that this image fails WP:NFCC in both this and worse in List of American mobsters of Irish descent where it also fails WP:NFLISTS. This image should not be included in the article.  TLSuda  (talk) 15:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Let me know when you get the image fixed and I will promote this article. Cheers,  TLSuda  (talk) 18:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I've actually removed the image as you suggested. I don't know how to fix that image, and as you point out WP:NFCC#8 seems to be a fatal flaw preventing use in this article under any circumstances. Coretheapple (talk) 21:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Aha, so you have! In that case, I'm happy to promote this article to Good Article!  TLSuda  (talk) 03:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Great! Thanks again. Coretheapple (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)