Talk:Johnny Warman

Tone
This article is, for me, typical of why Wikipedia is not taken seriously by many. The article contains a lot of info, yes. BUT its style is like a fanzine and not an encyclopedia. Just one example: Why "Johnny" all the time? He should be named "Warman" throughout the article. Others (Ringo Starr or whoever) should be named by their surnames.

Wikipedia is not a fan club nor is it an article in Rolling Stone. This is supposed to be a neutral, fact-based source with entries in an encyclopedia-like style. Given that context, it's no wonder the article has been flagged for NPOV. Jtnet (talk) 13:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed; I've search-and-replaced the surnames and copyedited it very slightly to fit, but the article definitely needs further attention - there's a lot of good content in here, it's just not particularly well written. I've flagged it with a "tone" concern template as well. Feel free to be WP:BOLD and help out the copyediting yourself. --McGeddon (talk) 18:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johnny Warman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615145126/http://web.comhem.se/gargantyrhome/Index.html to http://web.comhem.se/gargantyrhome/Index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)