Talk:Jon Krosnick

Recent edits
I'm concerned re: recent edits by, which, though well meaning, appears to be a conflict of interest account. I've removed some insufficiently sourced content, mostly about academic programs with which the account is affiliated. Probably there's a lot more here that could be trimmed as well. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 22:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Close paraphrasing
Please see WP:Close paraphrasing which gives tips on how to rewrite the section. Also the section will have to be taken out in a day or so if the tag stays, because of policy. Sorry, I don't have time to rewrite the stuff; but even if the section goes, you can always put it back once you have a better paraphrase. Churn and change (talk) 23:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Jon Krosnick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100629174258/http://www.eller.arizona.edu/speakers/2008/krosnick.asp to http://www.eller.arizona.edu/speakers/2008/krosnick.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121031235513/http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/nasa-pilot-survey.html to http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/nasa-pilot-survey.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080109101033/http://www.securitymanagement.com/news/sleeping-pilots-underscore-flight-risks-described-suppressed-nasa-report to http://www.securitymanagement.com/news/sleeping-pilots-underscore-flight-risks-described-suppressed-nasa-report
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20121228024338/https://www2.lawrenceville.org/podium/default.aspx?t=204&tn=Jon+Krosnick+%E2%80%9976+and+Election+2008&nid=451879&ptid=52302&sdb=0&mode=0&vcm=0 to https://www2.lawrenceville.org/podium/default.aspx?t=204&tn=Jon+Krosnick+%E2%80%9976+and+Election+2008&nid=451879&ptid=52302&sdb=0&mode=0&vcm=0
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130116034319/http://www.2janvier.com/study-if-americans-better-understood-the-affordable-care-act-they-would-like-it-more/ to http://www.2janvier.com/study-if-americans-better-understood-the-affordable-care-act-they-would-like-it-more/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120602192506/http://comm.stanford.edu/faculty/krosnick/docs/2008/2008%20Turnout%20Lit%20Review.pdf to http://comm.stanford.edu/faculty/krosnick/docs/2008/2008%20Turnout%20Lit%20Review.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110918101906/http://membercentral.aaas.org/multimedia/videos/global-challenges-2010-climate-and-energy-policy-new-congress to http://membercentral.aaas.org/multimedia/videos/global-challenges-2010-climate-and-energy-policy-new-congress

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Date of publication of https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=119958 is 2000-09-06
Here's where I got the year 2000 from, for my edit in :

Unfortunately, The Psychology of Voting by Lee Dye says "Sept. 6" and gives no year. The URL is uninformative too, but an examination of the page source gives useful metadata, notably

where I'm taking both  and   to be 2000-09-06. --Mathieu ottawa (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2018 (UTC)