Talk:Jon Waters

--bias--

this Wikipedia page reads like a PR page for Waters.

It criticizes the OSU investigation of waters without even bothering to reference documents actually related to the investigation or detail the allegations. It mentions other OSU documents without referencing them. is blatantly unfair to publish counter arguments to arguments that are not made.I don't think I've ever seen a more glaring violation of wikipedia's non biased point of view rules. Links to the OSU documents publicly available regarding the investigation needs to be provided or the criticism of the investigation removed.Jackhammer111 (talk) 21:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Notable?
Wow, this article is unbelievable. Twenty years ago this would have been rejected as a non-notable person. But if it is about a "notable" person, it is far more detailed than it needs to be a stub would be more appropriate. Unschool 12:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)