Talk:Jonas Bergström (lawyer)

Media coverage of "affair"
During several days prior to his breakup with the princess there was intense media coverage of rumors he had had an affair with another woman i 2009. Regardless whether or not any of that was true, the debate was even held in the most serious Swedish TV news programs. Thus the speculation itself is an unavoidable part of this BLP even if it may be controversial. I have rewritten the text about it to make it perfectly clear that the rumors are unsubstantiated. SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Such information, though controversial, should be included but only with a source. You can say that there are 100 sources but if you cite none, the information can't be included. Surtsicna (talk) 19:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Merge?
Swedish WP merged this article with that of Princess Madeleine's today because there is hardly anything encyclopaedically relevant about Bergström now that the marriage is off. What was kept about him (in her article) was the fact that they went with each other for many years, the dates of their engagement, how and where he had proposed, where they lived together while a couple and the way their relationship ended, including the huge media circus lately about his unsubstantiated infidelity. SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:17, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. We should merge the articles. Surtsicna (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge with large part (date of birth, infobox, etc) omitted. This person is no longer notable on his own from the moment the engagement is off. w.tanoto-soegiri (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Nobody has opposed, so I will merge the articles. If somebody opposes in the meantime, it's easy to revert. Surtsicna (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If he's to be redirected, the link should be to the engagement section. Additional clarity is desirable here.
 * Peter Isotalo 09:12, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Problem?
What is the problem for them? He is a man, not a woman. СЛУЖБА (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you explain, please? I hope you didn't mean to say that he, as a man, had had the right to cheat on her? Excuse me if I am mistaken! Surtsicna (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2010 (UTC)