Talk:Jonathan I. Schwartz/Archives/2014

Untitled
Why was the Wikipedia subject Particpation Age merged with Jonathan Schwartz? This makes no sense. The concept of the Participation Age, while officially coined by Jonathan, and part of Sun Microsystems' marketing message, is not part of Jonathan's identity. Note Cisco Systems has released a very similar marketing message, the Human network, and it does not redirect to John Chambers. Not only that, the founder of Wikipedia endorsed the concept of the Human network on Wikia.
 * Evidentally the topic is not notable enough to exist on its won to redirects to its most closely linked relation. SGGH speak! 17:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

he resigned
http://twitter.com/OpenJonathan/status/8620937722 80.219.22.194 (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

new homepage
http://jonathanischwartz.wordpress.com/

--olhe (talk) 06:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Notability
This guy is notable? Mbstone (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep. There's a Wikipedia article about him and everything.--NapoliRoma (talk) 07:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Perhaps only as CEO of Sun Microsystems, to which this material could be merged. He doesn't exactly jump out from the List of Sun Microsystems employees. William Avery (talk) 08:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * That's a pretty big "only." I don't see a lot to justify Tim Cook having his own article other than being the CEO of Apple, yet I wouldn't contest it.
 * Schwartz' tenure at Sun, even prior to his becoming CEO, put him in the news on a regular basis. I think there's enough here to continue to rate a standalone article. The Sun Microsystems article is already plenty long.--NapoliRoma (talk) 19:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Mbstone – you don't know what you are talking about, or you are trying to insult Jonathan Schwartz. He is obviously notable. gnirre (talk) 08:40, 5 May 2012 (UTC)