Talk:Jonathan Keltz

NOTE: This new article is substantially different
The original article that was deleted in January 2010 reflected that at that time the individual had not completed too many films nor had significant coverage. I was myself one who agreed that 15 months ago the individual was weak on ENT and GNG. Someone recreated the article in January 2011, but only as two meager and unsourced sentences. THAT recreation was properly CSD A7 speedied. In myself revisiting the topic 15 month later, I felt that enough had transpired over the intervening 15 months to finally allow a decent article. I contacted the deleting admin User:RHaworth about my writing a substantially different article about this individual, one that contained proper citations showing the meeting of WP:BLP and WP:ENT. He gave his approval for return of a proper article. See archived discussion here  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This new article is substantially different from both the one deleted in January 2010 and the stub that was A7 speedied in February 2011.

re inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Keltz
Looks great! No objections to a move back to article mainspace, if you wish to do so. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 14:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

-  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:13, 2 June 2011 (UTC)