Talk:Jones v. Harris Associates

judges' names should not have "J" after them. this is wikipedia, not an awful casebook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.98.130 (talk) 18:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Holding in the infobox
The current holding in the infobox reads: "The claim is valid under The Investment Company Act nevaise the fee is so large is proportion to the services rendered."

I'm not really sure what was intended here, but it should be rewritten to be comprehensible English. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Quotations
The quotations from Easterbrook and Posner are far too long, and should be summarized. 121a0012 (talk) 06:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)