Talk:Jordan Burroughs

Needs work
This article has two major problems: 1) it smacks of boosterism. 2) it uses technical terms (e.g., major decision and tech falling), which are neither linked nor explained. The article should be understandable to more than just wrestling experts.202.179.26.78 (talk) 10:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

This is a serious question. As opposed to bringing it up on a talk page with no activity, why didn't you just explain the technical terms the way you think is needed? Link it or explain it however you would like. That just seems like a better, more productive, approach than straight criticism. I am sure as heck not a booster and I've never heard the term boosterism so I'm safe on that one. I did attend one of Nebraska's Big 10 rivals, though, so I am familiar with the subject of this article. Good night and good luck.--Dr Gonzo5269 (talk) 02:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)