Talk:Jordan Pruitt

Notability
Are there any particular reasons for the notability question being raised? Pruitt has been featured on Disney Radio and the Disney Channel multiple times, and as the article notes, she both has been and currently is on tour nationally. She may not be as well-known as Miley Cyrus or Demi Lovato, but I think she qualifies under the notability guidelines. Theharmonyguy (talk) 22:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

What is this doing here? "tHE BEST SINGER IN POP." I took it out —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.230.0.129 (talk) 01:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Permission to Fly
I just deleted a sentence that said the following: "The album has yet to have a physical release." I have no idea where this statement came from, as the physical CD is clearly available from Amazon.com and, from what I understand, has been since August 26, 2008. Theharmonyguy (talk) 22:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

No Ordinary Girl
We should say what songs are on the album!Pahrak bionicle lover 00:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

It is great that Jordan Pruitt is a Christian Heavenleightschoepe (talk) 07:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jordan Pruitt - No Ordinary Girl (2007).jpg
Image:Jordan Pruitt - No Ordinary Girl (2007).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I've just found that this image is apparently from Flickr, and is permissible under the Creative Commons license if attributed: http://www.flickr.com/photos/34348916@N00/347136037/ Theharmonyguy (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

new pic please
no offence but this one's terrible. an unidentifiable silhouette.  tomasz.  13:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Was let go by Hollywood Records
On February 4th, Tommy2.Net confirmed that Jordan Pruitt is no longer with Hollywood Records. http://tommy2.net/content/?p=22708 --Rocknldokn (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 082118 YEP Rewind2924.jpg

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Jordan Pruitt Image.jpg

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Jordan Pruitt 2019.jpg

Please do not delete any new uploads of Jordan Pruitt
I believe that it is best to end the constant deletion of jpgs and/or pngs depicting the artist, and stick to a permanent image that is accurate. Blacklister3000 (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Files are usually only deleted when they violate some policy or guidelines. Most of the time it has to do with the licensing of the file. Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons are technically separate websites with their own respective policies and guidelines. You can find out some general information about these at c:Commons:Licensing and Wikipedia:Copyright. If you want to know why a specific file was deleted then you can ask the administrator who deleted. One thing about Commons though is that it will only accept files which are “100% free”. What this means is that it will not accept content protected by copyright unless it has been clearly released by the copyright holder under a free license accepted by Commons. So, if you take your own photo of Pruitt and want to release under a free license, you can; you cannot, however, take photos or images created by others (even stuff posted online on freely accessible websites) and upload it to Commons or Wikipedia without the copyright holder’s (i.e. creator’s) permission. For more on this, please read c:Commons:OTRS. Wikipedia does, unlike Commons, allow some copyrighted content to be uploaded without explicit copyright holder permission as non-free content when its use complies with Wikipedia’s non-free content use policy; this policy is, however, quite restrictive and a non-free image of a still living person is pretty much never going to be allowed per WP:FREER. So, unless you can find an existing image of Pruitt which has been already released under a free license or can convince the copyright holder of such an image to release it under a free license, Wikipedia is just going to have to wait until such someone else does. — Marchjuly (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)