Talk:Jordan Schroeder/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Giants  27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 22:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I can't find anything in the article that should prevent it from being a good article. Great work.-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 22:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)