Talk:Jordan block

If this article is never going to have more information than it has now, I think it should be replaced with a redirect to the Jordan form article. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:42, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The article will never get more information if it is converted from a stub into a redirect. Stubbed articles invite every wikipedian to contribute and improve the article and redirects... Well, they just hide the article. --Mecanismo | Talk 01:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Stub Vs redirect
It seems that there are users who don't agree with this article and try to unilaterally convert the article into a redirect. If you believe so strongly about the redirection, please mark it as an article for deletion and vote for a redirect. Doing so ensures a public discussion about the article and a public consensus can be achieved. If certain users try to unilaterally eliminate this article then other users have the exact same merit at eliminating the redirect and reintroducing the article. --Mecanismo | Talk 01:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * According to Deletion policy if something is "Such a minor branch of a subject that it doesn't deserve an article" then we should "Merge the useful content into a more comprehensive article and redirect" instead of going through the AFD process, which is designed for deletion. If you really think this is a big deal, you can request more eyes at Requests for comment/Maths, science, and technology.  But I don't think its that big of a deal.  I won't be the *next* person to revert you.  I'll see what others think.  If nobody redoes the redirect, then I'll leave it it be.  --Rob 07:16, 23 December 2005 (UTC)