Talk:José María Arguedas

Plagiarism
This article would seem to have been taken almost wholesale from The World Heritage Encyclopedia. I guess it's possible that they plagiarized Wikipedia, but it seems to me unlikely. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 03:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, looking a little closer... it would seem clear that in fact it is the World Heritage Encylopedia ("the aggregation of the largest online encyclopedias available") that is the villain here. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 03:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on José María Arguedas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110224045017/http://arguedas.org/ to http://arguedas.org/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070217065835/http://gonzaloportocarrero.blogsome.com/2006/06/01/todas-las-sangres/ to http://gonzaloportocarrero.blogsome.com/2006/06/01/todas-las-sangres/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:13, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Mestizo descent??
I've read the relevant sections of the article closely, twice, and I know that he wrote about Mestizo culture, etc. But I'm still having serious doubts about the validity of the two categories that characterize him as "Mestizo". I don't want to remove those categories without more clarity on the issue, so I'd appreciate if a knowledgable editor could shed light on the matter. Please ping me when you reply. Thanks! Anomalous+0 (talk) 02:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC)