Talk:Joseph B. O'Hagan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: StraussInTheHouse (talk · contribs) 11:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Criteria
Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ;
 * (c) ; and
 * (d).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 :</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion

 * Hi, thank you for your nomination, and my apologies for the delay between starting the review and finishing it, I've been a bit busy over the past few days. Please see my above feedback and ping me back here and I'll be happy to re-review the one "on hold" point.  Many thanks,   SITH   (talk)   16:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, . The self-published ref is not cited for the portion that is actually written by O'Hagan, but for the introductory portion written by the editor. I think that avoids the self-published issue.  Ergo Sum  16:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Have you had a chance to take a look at my reply?  Ergo Sum  03:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, my apologies, I've had a technical issue and a been a bit busier than I anticipated. I will re-review tonight.  Many thanks,   SITH   (talk)   12:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)