Talk:Joseph Franklin Rutherford/Archive 1

Very sanitary article
No mention of his personal demons (such as drinking), relationship with wife, Beth Sarim, 1925, his forceful takeover of the Watchtower? Why is this article bereft of these facts? joshbuddy 07:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

J F Rutherford did not have these personal demons. He was known as a strong and disciplined person. Why would they put of opinions that are not known to anyone out there? You say facts but really they're not.

Why no mention of his directive to build a mansion in the San Fran bay area with society funds for the resurrected (moses aaron ect) that never came true, and when it never came true he moved in himself. That instance is well documented in several places. Justinmcl 199.243.211.114 02:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

"You say facts but really they're not". -this is basically the tactic that jehovah's witnesses use, the art of persuasion by method of confusion, consistent subject change and often the use of the word 'complex' an arbitrary number of times. I don't care what your indoctrinated, brainwashed mind thinks or what your own (yes thats right the NWT is in fact the JW's home brewed bible) bible tells you to do, you cannot change fact. This is Wikipedia, it contains facts.

Wikipedia contains facts? That's a laugh. While some of a subject may be true, you have to understand that when an article is under the editing of anyone who feels they can write something semi-logical, there are bound to be "facts" that are not the truth. You can never fully believe anything from wikipedia or most other sites, that is a fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.189.130.115 (talk) 18:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Simply find a verifiable reference, and include the new encyclopedic point of interest.


 * --AuthorityTam (talk) 13:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 20:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)