Talk:Joseph Terry/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mackensen (talk · contribs) 00:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your work on this article. I hope to have comments for you shortly. Best, Mackensen (talk) 00:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Initial review complete. There are just a few minor issues to address, and we'll be good to go. Mackensen (talk) 01:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Addressing concerns
2a. I've rectified any lack of clarity as indicated by the tags.

2b. I believe the ISBN numbers for the aforementioned books are in line with the Google Books service, correct me if I'm wrong.

6a. I made a previous version of these arms that was removed due to the lack of evidence for free use. I therefore stated the origin of each element of the image this time around.
 * Thanks for the clarification on the arms. Regarding 2a, is the location for new factory built in 1886 unknown? As for the ISBN numbers, they don't resolve in any of the ISBN lookup services and I would have expected them to. Without knowing which Google Books you looked at, as they aren't linked, and I can't speak to what you saw. Mackensen (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your speedy comeback. My mistake on the count of 2a, just a factual omission, I've since dealt with that inaccuracy. Furthermore, I've altered the concerned ISBNs for your inspection. Curlymanjaro (talk) 15:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I would also like to add that I've added an invaluable Oxford DNB source to cut down on written sources for a short article such as this. I hope I have your blessing in reducing the font size of said references; being so many of them, I'm merely trying to reduce their visual prominence. Curlymanjaro (talk) 17:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That's all fine by me--good work. I'm happy to pass this review. Best, Mackensen (talk) 02:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)